Field NotesPositioning

The Five Types of Go-to-Market Strategy, and Why Most Teams Pick the Wrong One

Every use case you add to a go-to-market strategy multiplies the cost of selling. Here is how to choose the shape that fits.

May 25, 2026

Photo: Ivan Bandura / Unsplash

"The use cases are endless." Founders say it to raise money and to excite a team, because endless use cases imply an endless market. It is also the sentence that quietly wrecks a go-to-market strategy. Every use case you decide to serve needs its own programme to reach buyers, prove value, and close. The more you carry, the more complex and expensive the selling becomes. For early teams in Singapore and across Southeast Asia, where budgets are tight and attention is scattered across a dozen fragmented markets, that cost compounds faster than anywhere else.

This guide sets out the five types of go-to-market strategy, the trade-off each one makes, and how to choose the shape that matches what you actually sell rather than the shape that flatters your ambition.

What Is a Go-to-Market Strategy?

A go-to-market strategy is the system by which a company reaches its customers and turns a product into revenue. It defines who you sell to, what you say, how you reach them, and how you close and keep them. One of the least understood choices inside that system is breadth: how many distinct use cases the strategy is built to serve. Breadth is not a detail. It is the single decision that most shapes how complex, and how expensive, your selling will be.

The common mistake is treating breadth as free. A product that "does many things" feels like a larger opportunity, so teams build broad from day one. In practice each use case demands its own positioning, its own proof, and its own buyers, so going broad early means running several underfunded go-to-market programmes at once instead of one that works.

The Five Types of Go-to-Market Strategy

Drawing on a useful framework from Rob Kaminski of FletchPMM, go-to-market strategies sort into five shapes by how many use cases they serve.

Vertical: The most focused shape. One specific group of people, one job to be done. Kaminski's own firm helps early-stage SaaS founders rewrite their homepage positioning, nothing else. Because it is so narrow, it generates word-of-mouth: when a founder in that exact situation comes up, the referral is automatic. This is the cheapest strategy to run and the easiest to be known for.

Horizontal: One core use case, extended into adjacent versions of the same job. Calendly schedules meetings, then accommodates teachers booking parent conferences, sales reps booking demos, recruiters booking interviews. The job stays constant; the audiences multiply. Loom and Asana sit here too.

Vertical solutions: One industry, then adjacent jobs within it. Procore starts with construction project management, then expands into pre-construction estimates, financial planning, and on-site workforce management. The customer stays the same; the problems you solve for them widen.

Horizontal suite: Several horizontal products bundled into one offer, the shape Google and Microsoft run. The hard prerequisite is that each product must reach product-market fit on its own before bundling. Suite-first, with no individual fit, is how teams build a bundle nobody wants.

Platform: A "raw material" product used to build other things. Airtable is the example. The trap is that "you can build anything" markets to no one, because the compelling value sits in the specific. Airtable lands not on "build anything" but on "build a custom CRM in minutes" or "build a marketing campaign manager". Platforms have to borrow the clarity of a vertical to be sold at all.

Why Most Teams Pick the Wrong Go-to-Market Strategy

The wrong pick is almost always too broad, too soon. Breadth feels like ambition, and ambition is what gets funded, so teams reach for horizontal or platform shapes before they have dominated anything. The result is several half-resourced programmes, none strong enough to generate the referrals and proof that make selling cheap.

The discipline runs the other way. Start vertical. Dominate one segment until you are the obvious choice for one specific buyer doing one specific job. That domination becomes a wedge: once you own a segment, you have the proof, the references, and the cash to broaden into a horizontal or vertical-solution shape deliberately. You will need to add use cases to become a large business. The order is what matters. Earn breadth from a position of strength rather than starting broke and broad.

In Southeast Asia this is sharper still. A vertical strategy that makes you the known name for one buyer in Singapore is portable: you can carry that proof into Malaysia or Indonesia and adapt it. A broad strategy spread thin across five markets and five use cases at once gives you no domination anywhere, and nothing to carry.

A Worked Example: Choosing the Shape

Take a SaaS company entering Southeast Asia with a product that genuinely could serve marketing, operations, and finance teams. The endless-use-case instinct says address all three, because the market looks three times larger. The disciplined read says pick the one where you can become the obvious choice fastest, win it until referrals flow, then use that base to expand into the adjacent team. The product capability is identical in both cases. Only the go-to-market strategy differs, and only the focused version compounds.

Where to Start

The practical sequence is short. Map your current go-to-market strategy against the five shapes and name which one you are actually running, not the one you intend. Count the use cases you are funding right now, and be honest about how many of those programmes are properly resourced. If the answer is "several, none fully", you have found your problem. Cut to the single segment where you can dominate, build the proof and referral engine there, and only then extend. Treat every new use case as a deliberate purchase with a real cost attached, because that is what it is.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a go-to-market strategy? A go-to-market strategy is the system for reaching customers and turning a product into revenue: who you sell to, what you tell them, how you reach them, and how you close and keep them. How many use cases it serves is one of its defining choices.

What are the types of go-to-market strategy? Five common shapes, by breadth of use case: vertical (one audience, one job), horizontal (one job, many audiences), vertical solutions (one industry, many jobs), horizontal suite (several products bundled), and platform (raw material used to build other things).

Which go-to-market strategy is best for a startup? Usually the vertical shape. Dominating one narrow segment is cheaper to run, generates word-of-mouth, and creates the proof and cash to expand later. Starting broad spreads a small team across several underfunded programmes.

What is the difference between a go-to-market strategy and a marketing plan? A go-to-market strategy is the whole system for reaching and winning customers, including which use cases you serve. A marketing plan is one execution layer inside it.

Go-to-Market · Positioning

Seeing this in your own team?

Every engagement starts with a diagnosis of the system you run today. It ends with a brief, an install, or a system we keep running with you.